Page 88 - Riem-Vol5_nº5

Basic HTML Version

636
IBRACON Structures and Materials Journal • 2012 • vol. 5 • nº 5
Fatigue lifetime of a RC bridge along the Carajás railroad
concrete in laboratorial tests, with a properly calibrated rebound
hammer is ± 15% 20%, and in a concrete structure is ± 25%.
The measurements of modulus of elasticity of the concrete (Ec)
determined experimentally according to NBR 8522 : 2003 [7],
are presented in Table 4 together with the resistance to axial
compression experimentally determined in accordance with
NBR 5739 : 1994 [8 ].
In Figures 16 to 20 it can be seen the result of the configura-
tion adopted for the tests as a function of time, where the loads
ranged from 0.5 MPa to 30% of the failure stresses estimat-
ed for the concrete testimonies according to the current code
prescriptions, and the stress-strain diagrams generated as the
tests were performed.
4. Structural project analysis according
to codes’ prescriptions
4.1 Dead load effects on the stringers
All permanent loads (corresponding to stringers self-weight,
Figure �� � �tress-time and stress-strain diagrams for the left side stringer
crossbeams, refuges, ballast, rails, accessories, etc.) and dy-
namic loads were separately considered, corresponding to the
several trains type studied (Cooper E80, operational, loaded,
future loaded and unloaded operational train-type). Figure 21
shows, respectively, bending moment and shear force diagrams
due to permanent loading from the computational program
SAP2000 [10].
4.2 Dynamic loads history
For the determination of the applied loading on the stringers (bend-
ing moment and shear) each of the spans was subdivided into ten
parts, resulting in 21 sections, as done in the calculation memory.
As illustration, the forces’ variation from SAP200 [10] for section
21 is presented, corresponding to the fix point between the deck
slab and abutment E2 and considered the most requested section
under several trains types passage without permanent loads. The
other sections time histories were also obtained, but only their en-
velopes are presented. Figures 22 to 25 show the dynamic loading
history for several trains.
Figure �� � �e��i�g ���e�t a�� shear ��rce characteristic values