Page 87 - Riem-Vol6_nº1

Basic HTML Version

81
IBRACON Structures and Materials Journal • 2013 • vol. 6 • nº 1
D. M. OLIVEIRA | N. A. SILVA | C. F. BREMER | H. INOUE
was that corresponding to the action of the wind, considered more
unfavorable than out-of-plumb, both for direction
X
and for direc-
tion
Y.
It is worth pointing out that the drag forces were calculated
in accordance with the precepts of NBR 6123:1988 [14].
The coefficients applied to the actions, defined from the ultimate
normal combination that considers the wind to be the main variable
action, were determined as recommended by NBR 6118:2007[2].
Figure 3 – Typical storey of building II (adapted from LOPES et al. [11])
Measurements in cm
Beams - V1 to V21
Columns - P1 to P16
Slabs - L1 to L11: h = 10
Figure 4 – Slab-beam model
utilizing the “beam 44” element
BEAMAXIS
AVERAGE PLAN OF SLAB
Figure 5 – Connection between
the beams and the columns
RIGID BAR
CG OF COLUMN